New Shopping Technology Could Breed Supermarket Discrimination
from the don't-we-have-more-important-things-to-worry-about? dept
I know that there are some people in this world who really hate those membership cards that many supermarkets force on their customers in order to receive various discounts. The issue that many have is that it's a privacy invasion because (of course) the supermarkets aren't just offering you discounts, they're tracking your every purchase (ooh scary). For the people who really hate those systems, they are (of course) free to not use those cards, or to support stores that don't make use of them. Now those same folks have the chance to get extra ballistic reading about how Safeway is testing out computerized shopping carts in a couple of their stores. Shoppers swipe their cards, and are directed to cheaper items, or to items they often buy. However, some are afraid that this will lead to different "classes" of shoppers as some get benefits that others don't. I'm not sure I see why this is such a big deal. In fact, as someone points out in the article, such a system might backfire when people realize just how much info is collected about them.
7 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- DailyDirt: Autonomous Vehicles
- How Publishers Repeated The Same Mistake As Record Labels: DRM Obsession Gave Amazon Dominant Position
- Park Ranger Tases Guy Walking Dogs Without A Leash
- Brazilian Government Ordering Web Hosting Firms To Kill Domain Names They Don't Like
- Syrian President's Email Hacked... His Password Was 12345





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
The cards are bad,
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No-Privacy Worst Case Scenario
Could health-insurance agencies get access to this information someday, and deny coverage to people who buy high-fat/cholesterol foods? Can they charge more for 'riskier' individuals who have purchased cigarettes?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
And SteveYi, if they deny or charge the smoking, fried food eaters more for insurance or deny them ... oh well. I'm tired of paying for the way other people choose to drive or eat them selves to death. If it keeps my insurance premiums down, go for it.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
I shop at a Warehouse type store that advertises no cards necessary - same low prices for all customers, etc.
I remember hearing a news story last year about some divorce case in CA where the wife was trying to use the alcohol purchases on record at the grocery store to claim her ex was an alcoholic, abusive, etc. Not sure how it turned out - not even sure if it was real. It could be an urban legend, but its still worth worrying about IMO.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
How long will they last?
On the whole, the expense is probably going to outweight the benefit for the grocery stores.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Privacy is dead...long live privacy...
Creating a utopia built on impulse buying will ultimately fail, however, as it has in the past and is currently happening. Greed drives it, but greed is a pursuit that ends with an ultimate collapse of economy. People aren't saving money, they aren't managing their budgets, and they are struggling to make ends meet. For all our technology, we are a country which is slowly turning itself into a welfare economy, and the stock markets and consumer confidence is beginning to show this.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No-Privacy Worst Case Scenario
The privacy may be compromised if a consumer does not see what he/she has right to see, because the buying experience would be "customized" based on all these weird computerized carts. I think, at the end of the day, it all depends on what Safeway does with your data. There are many effective means to collect the data, use them, and not violate anyone's privacy, but who is going to watch?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment