Studies

Studies

by Mike Masnick




Could Pay-for-Play Replace Peer-to-Peer?

from the meaningless-studies dept

A new research study pretty much states the obvious when it comes to online music. If there were no free P2P file sharing programs out there, more people would be willing to sign up for pay services. Of course, it's still a small percentage (less than one-third) who would. Interestingly (and surprisingly, to me) more people said they would be willing to do pay-per-download than a subscription fee. I would have thought an "all you can eat" program would make more sense. Of the other findings, though, over half of the people surveyed didn't see anything morally wrong with downloading music, and 62% said they bought a CD after sampling songs from it via the internet. I always wonder about studies like this one, though, because it's so easy to have biased questions that push people towards a specific answer. "Do you share music with friends online?" and "Do you pirate copyrighted songs online?" may be asking the same thing, but could elicit very different answers...

2 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Oct 5th, 2002 @ 7:45am
  • The Music Industry Cds

    Why can't the music industry just sell single tracks online and the new .mp4 (aac) rate. I think a lot of people would be willing to get a quality like that for pennies on the dollar. Who needs a full CD with that 4 or 5 songs you never would buy normally. If the internet was ripping of so much business from the music industry, the music industry would have found way to make money off of it sooner. And let's remember that the CDs are marked up heavily. Why not let the consumer decide on the markup of a CD? After all they have been ripping us off for years.

    The record industry, should it screw up, will lose more and more customers to the internet and bands will start to sell from their own websites. This also can be applied to the movie biz... Imagine Tom Cruise... Why should he take $20 million from Paramount when he can make $200 milllion distributing it "Digitally" himself from a website.

    Lack of insite still stammers the entertainment and music industry. They're all going to lose their jobs...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Oct 7th, 2002 @ 12:07pm
  • Could Pay-for-Play Replace Peer-to-Peer?

    by Anonymous Coward

    Nope. Hollywood will try this and it will not be wildly successfull. Since it's Hollywoods right to be wildly successful the blame will fall on p2p. They will continue to buy their justice and artifically inflate costs to protect themselves. I wonder how long it will take before they sue Cisco. If you can get them to spend their money identifying and blocking mp3s they'd stand a chance.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It