Changing The Debate On Pop Up Ads
from the it's-not-about-the-frequency dept
A bit of a rant from Robert Loch concerning a bunch of recent articles saying that pop-up ads aren't so bad, they just need to decrease in frequency. It seems that the advertising industry is trying "change the debate" on pop ups. Instead of responding to people who find them annoying, they're trying to say "oh, they're not so bad, it's just that there are too many." Robert's right in his basic point. Pop ups are flat out bad. They hijack the user's computer, and they make for a bad surfing experience (they also have a habit of crashing my browser at least once a day). Robert's argument is that they don't fit in with the "flow" of surfing. I'd take the argument even further. Advertising that pisses off people who see it is not effective advertising. It's stupid, uncreative, wasteful advertising. If a company thinks the only way to get their message to me is to interrupt my surfing plans, then I don't think they deserve my business.
1 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- If People Like You And Your Work They'll Pay; If They Like Your Work, But Don't Like You, They'll Infringe
- The Pirate Bay's Peter Sunde Questions Why We Let Dying Industries Dictate Terms Of Democracy
- EU Official Who Resigned Over ACTA Details Why ACTA Is Dangerous; While His Replacement Seems Unlikely To Care
- Debunking The EU Commission's 'Myths About ACTA'
- European Parliament President Criticizes ACTA





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Should be irrelavent
steve snyder
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment