Do Laws Of Trespass Cover The Internet?
from the interesting-questions dept
An interesting opinion piece from the Financial Times looks at whether or not we need special laws concerning "internet trespassing" or are current laws sufficient. I have trouble with some of his arguments, because I do think that the internet is, in many ways, different than regular property. In general, I have trouble with arguments that say someone should resort to laws in order to keep someone off their website. There are technology solutions, and I much prefer to see companies put them to use. If you don't want others accessing your website, then you shouldn't go online. In the case of Hamidi vs. Intel, though, I do tend to side with Intel - but not based on the trespass claim. I think they could get Hamidi on an unsolicited email claim, instead, for spamming so many of their employees.
1 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Russian Appeals Court Says Popular Social Network vKontakte Is Liable For File Sharing By Users
- Judge In Grooveshark Lawsuit Orders Blog To 'Preserve' Logs That Had Already Been Deleted
- Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Tenenbaum Case; Allows Charade To Continue
- Should People Learn To Code? Yes – If They Are Judges Ruling On Cases Involving Software
- How TPP Would Put Massive Burdens On Those Accused Of Infringement






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
If were're going to have internet trespassing laws
Actually, I'm in the hackers suing the corps. camp on that one, but it could easily apply to all those poorly configured wireless access points as well.
Don't get me started on my "maintaining a honey pot is entrapment" rant...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment