Do Laws Of Trespass Cover The Internet?

from the interesting-questions dept

An interesting opinion piece from the Financial Times looks at whether or not we need special laws concerning "internet trespassing" or are current laws sufficient. I have trouble with some of his arguments, because I do think that the internet is, in many ways, different than regular property. In general, I have trouble with arguments that say someone should resort to laws in order to keep someone off their website. There are technology solutions, and I much prefer to see companies put them to use. If you don't want others accessing your website, then you shouldn't go online. In the case of Hamidi vs. Intel, though, I do tend to side with Intel - but not based on the trespass claim. I think they could get Hamidi on an unsolicited email claim, instead, for spamming so many of their employees.

1 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 


 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    If were're going to have internet trespassing laws

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 2nd, 2002 @ 5:50am

    ...then we need internet "maintaining an attractive nusance" laws as well.

    Actually, I'm in the hackers suing the corps. camp on that one, but it could easily apply to all those poorly configured wireless access points as well.

    Don't get me started on my "maintaining a honey pot is entrapment" rant...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
Essential Reading
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This