RSS
Time Warner Cracking Down On Free WiFi Access Points
from the what-isn't-stealing-these-days? dept
This isn't particularly surprising, but Time Warner Cable in NYC has decided to send out threatening letters to NYC residents (NYTimes article, registration etc) who they believe are offering up WiFi access to their cable service. They're (of course) afraid that if someone boosts the signal enough, then suddenly all those potentially paying customers will be getting something (gasp!) for nothing. Interestingly, they sent the note to someone who claims he's never set up a wireless network and doesn't have any wireless equipment himself. Nice of them to do their homework before threatening legal action. Politech also has some details about the letters (for those of you who'd like to avoid the NYTimes registration). They have an email from someone who received the letter, someone defending the letter, and finally the text of the letter itself. The NYTimes points out, by the way, that some smaller ISPs are touting their service as being open WiFi "friendly", in the hopes that it will encourage people to sign up with them. Once again, when a big company tries to prevent giving customers what they want, a small competitor will step in and provide it. Now the big companies will (1) lose their original customers and (2) still not get access to all the people who would have been using the shared access.
5 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Beastie Boy Mike D Forces AT&T To Let Shareholders Vote On Net Neutrality
- Congress Trying To Regulate Certain Wireless Spectrum Issues... In A Payroll Tax Bill?
- Verizon Wireless: Paying Online Is More Convenient, So Now You Have To Pay $2 To Do So [Updated]
- Is Verizon Wireless Violating Its Promise To Be Open By Blocking Google Wallet?
- Innovation In Wireless: The Disruption In Connectivity
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Everyone wants something for nothing
I'm surprised the same WiFi proponents aren't mad at Starbucks for charging for Internet access. The average Internet yap likes to ignore the fact that companies need to make money.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Everyone wants something for nothing
Anyway, I never ignore the fact that companies need to make money. However, I disagree with the assertion that many people are making these days that companies have a fundamental right to their flawed business model. Plenty of companies go out of business every year, and it's mostly because they simply can't give customers what they want. Complaining that customers won't pay you for what they don't want doesn't seem like a really visionary business strategy.
As for your Starbucks example, I don't see why you think that's true. I don't think anyone has an issue with anyone doing what the company wants, in terms of charging. It's just when they prevent the users from doing what the user wants, that they get upset.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Typical GREED
FU AOL-TW!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
http://news.com.com/2009-1033-940460.html
Just because the user wants to do something doesn't mean he should be able to. Do you split your wires to get free cable access on four TVs for the price of one?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
Good businesses figure out how to give a customer what he or she wants. Bad businesses figure out that a customer has figured out how to get what he or she wants and tries to prevent that from happening.
You're right. It doesn't mean he should be able to, but if he wants to do so, then that's a business opportunity for someone... and as is pointed out in the article, there are clearly others willing to provide the service.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment