Misleading Articles About Web Porn Filters
from the thanks-for-the-balanced-story dept
It's amazing what reporters can get away with these days. In the Washington Post today there's an article about libraries not putting porn filters on the internet that quotes a number of outraged parents who (gasp!) can't believe libraries allow such open access. The article mentions the court ruling, but only says the decision was based on free-speech rights. Not once does the article point out that these filters simply don't work - and, in fact, often block very legitimate non-porn sites. Instead, the article makes it sound as if the courts are saying that kids deserve access to porn as well.
1 Comments | Leave a Comment..
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Musician Wonders What It Would Take To Become An Open Source Musician
- Mark Twain: Copyright Maximalist Who Also Believed That Nearly All Human Utterances Were Plagiarism?
- Game Of Thrones On Track To Be Most Pirated Show Of 2012; Pirates Still Asking HBO For Legitimate Options
- Combating The Culture Of Fear And Doubt By Reclaiming Fair Use! (Techdirt's May Book Club Choice)
- The Ridiculous Hoops Mad Men Had To Jump Through To Use Part Of A Beatles Song






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
No Subject Given
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment