Two Years To Save The World
from the not-so-bad,-right? dept
A new study has shown that, despite some dire predictions by governments around the world, it really wouldn't be that costly to stop global warming over the long term. The study suggests that the world economy will be five times as large as it is today in 100 years. However, if we take some time to fix the atmospher, it would take 102 years to reach that point (according to the researchers). The study is designed to contradict government officials who say it would create a worldwide recession if we had to spend time fixing the atmosphere.
9 Comments | Leave a Comment..
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- How Being More Open, Human And Awesome Can Save Anyone Worried About Making Money In Entertainment
- Evidence Shows That Megaupload Shutdown Had No Real Impact On Infringement
- DailyDirt: Anthropomorphizing Animals
- DailyDirt: Birds Do The Darndest Things
- iPhone Data Debunks Recording Industry's Report On How French Three Strikes Law Increased Sales





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Let's Get Our Priorities Straight
We simply have our priorities confused.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
It could fix the recession
Replacing outdated and high polluting autos, appliances, heavy equipment, factories and such, would provide work. People working at good paying jobs spend money on new things.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
the last cow
Hell we wanted to tap one of our own wildlife refuges just for the oil even though studies said there is only enough there for 2 full days of use for the entire country.
Many of the words problems right now would be lessened or erased completely if we just got off the oil kick. We just need to get a clean, green-friendly, renewable resource that cant be taken hostage by the rich folks.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
2) If you do have that research...I'm not convinced that's true. If you have that research was it biased? Paid for by oil companies?
3) While it MAY be true (and I would hope that it IS true that Global Warming is a NON event, one less thing to worry about)...Global warming is NOT the ONLY consequence of pollution that we have to worry about.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
warmer is better
Time's change so more data needs looking into, and at that not made up data!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment