Security Through Obsolescence?

from the is-that-really-safe? dept

While many people practice "security through obscurity", but simply placing things in hard to find places, this article talks about others who prefer security through obsolescence. The idea is that with older software products, there are more security patches, they're more stable, and (most importantly) most of today's hackers don't know (or care) anything about them. This seems like a fairly weak argument - as even the article points out that most security holes are due to configuration errors.

2 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 6th, 2002 @ 2:06pm

    I thought most security holes were due to Windows?!?!?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    I'm stoopid

    identicon
    msykes, Jun 6th, 2002 @ 3:59pm

    You know, I just now realized that Windows has to by definition have security holes. I mean they don't call the OS "Brick Walls"!

    Okay, but my real point... the ultimate security is to combine security by obsolescence with security by obscurity! Unbreakable!

    msykes

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This