Security Through Obsolescence?
from the is-that-really-safe? dept
While many people practice "security through obscurity", but simply placing things in hard to find places, this article talks about others who prefer security through obsolescence. The idea is that with older software products, there are more security patches, they're more stable, and (most importantly) most of today's hackers don't know (or care) anything about them. This seems like a fairly weak argument - as even the article points out that most security holes are due to configuration errors.
2 Comments | Leave a Comment..
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- DailyDirt: Autonomous Vehicles
- How Publishers Repeated The Same Mistake As Record Labels: DRM Obsession Gave Amazon Dominant Position
- Park Ranger Tases Guy Walking Dogs Without A Leash
- Brazilian Government Ordering Web Hosting Firms To Kill Domain Names They Don't Like
- Syrian President's Email Hacked... His Password Was 12345





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
No Subject Given
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I'm stoopid
Okay, but my real point... the ultimate security is to combine security by obsolescence with security by obscurity! Unbreakable!
msykes
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment