RSS
ReplayTV Ready To Fight
from the not-backing-down dept
Unlike many other companies that are being forced by the entertainment industry to back down, SonicBlue's ReplayTV is ready to fight the industry. Whereas companies like Napster and AudioGalaxy tried to negotiate with the entertainment industry to no avail - SonicBlue believes that negotiating isn't going to work. They're just going to put out their products and fight for the right for them to exist. As one exec there says, "it's virtually impossible for the courts to get you to stop selling your product once it's on the market." Of course, they have a history of fighting and winning, since this was the same company that put out one of the first MP3-playing devices and had to go to court over that as well.
9 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Schrödinger's Download: Whether Or Not An iTunes Music Sale Is A 'Sale' Depends On Who's Suing
- We Don't Have A 'Wild West' Internet Now, But We Will If SOPA Or Similar Is Passed
- One Nation, Under Guard
- Supreme Court Denies Appeal For The Pirate Bay Founders
- White House Says It Can't Comment On Possible Chris Dodd Investigation
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Just more Napster-like justification for theft
But the fact is, anyone who uses Kazaa or Morpheus to download copyrighted music files, or anyone who gleefully uses the commercial skipper to avoid seeing an ad, is nothing more than a two-bit thief!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Just more Napster-like justification for theft
How are they thieves?
You're wrong on a very simple point: what SonicBlue and others are doing is providing customers with a service they want. That's good business. What the entertainment industry is trying to do is block people from doing what they'd like to do. That's bad business, and it's going to bite them.
What's funny is that people with shortsighted views like yours said the same thing about the VCR killing movies and television... and, instead they revitalized the industry.
New technologies come along all the time. It's the job of a good business to adapt to the changing environment. What you're saying is that the entertainment industry (unlike EVERY other industry) has a fundamental right to their business model. I think that's more dangerous. Because, the end result is that the entertainment industry has no incentive to change, no incentive to compete and no incentive to actually offer their own consumers what they want. That's how industries die.
You say that the entertainment industry will die if these technologies continue. I argue that the reverse is true. If we stifle these technologies in the US, customers *will* go elsewhere. If the entertainment industry continues to do what it can to annoy its own users - SOMEONE ELSE will come in and offer consumers what they want (almost definitely from outside the country).
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Just more Napster-like justification for theft
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Hardly anything new...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Just more Napster-like justification for theft
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Just more Napster-like justification for theft
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
ooh, biting assessment!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Free TV?
All advertisers really need to do is make good commercials. We were watching some World Cup games on TiVo the other day, and we actually stopped to watch the commercials because they were funny! (now granted someone else had already seen them, in order to warn us they were funny). I mean there are TV specials like "World's Best Commercials". There's clearly a market for them. If the industry is afraid that nobody will watch commercials all they really need to do is get their heads out of their asses and start making good ones.
msykes
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: ooh, biting assessment!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment