Supreme Court Partially Upholds COPA
from the not-that-surprising dept
The Supreme Court has sent the lawsuit about the Child Online Protection Act (COPA) back to the federal appeals court saying that just because the law uses the "community standards" test to determine what's obscene, doesn't mean it's unconstitutional. I'm trying to remember back to various law classes I took years ago, and I'm pretty sure that the "community standards" test is pretty much accepted practice for determining what counts as pornography - so the ruling doesn't come as that big of a surprise. Using the standard "I am not a lawyer" caveat, I would think that with that standard in place, I would try to argue that the "community" of the internet is much broader than the local community, in order to suggest that the bar needs to be much higher. However, as the Supreme Court says, there are still many other points on which the law could be found unconstitutional.
- Schrödinger's Download: Whether Or Not An iTunes Music Sale Is A 'Sale' Depends On Who's Suing
- We Don't Have A 'Wild West' Internet Now, But We Will If SOPA Or Similar Is Passed
- One Nation, Under Guard
- Supreme Court Denies Appeal For The Pirate Bay Founders
- White House Says It Can't Comment On Possible Chris Dodd Investigation





Add Your Comment