Destruction Is Tough >>
<< Watch The News Change
 tdicon 


Studies

by Mike Masnick

Thu, May 9th 2002 12:42pm





Many Ad Click-Throughs Just Kids Who Don't Know Better

from the ouch dept

The latest research from the always popular with the press Nielsen Norman Group suggests that a "significant" amount of online advertising click throughs may be coming from children who can't distinguish the ads from regular content, and are attracted to the flashing/blinking excitement of an ad. They suggest that parents teach their kids how to avoid ads. While I have nothing against parents teaching their kids to distinguish advertising from real content (though, these days, it's often becoming tougher to tell...), I do wonder how "significant" these findings really are. How often are these kids clicking through on these ads, and what are they doing once they click through? From the article, it makes it sound as if these kids are just randomly clicking away on anything they see online, paying no attention to anything except what's flashing most brightly at them.

3 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    luser, May 9th, 2002 @ 1:14pm

    Hell, the only reason *I* click on anything is if it's shiny, flashing or naked.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    Al, May 9th, 2002 @ 11:11pm

    I think it could be right on the dollar. Kids do tend to have click-it itis.

    The only time I click on these ads, is by mistake, usually because the ads have been positioned to encourage such mistakes. I always close them before they fully load.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Teach kids to discern

    identicon
    steve snyder, May 10th, 2002 @ 8:54am

    I've been involved in similar debates over the years, both on Slashdot & amongst my CBT & teacher friends. The argument always comes up that no wonder kinds aren't learning anything in school any more, the production value of classes is such a far cry from TV/Video Games/whatever else. The argument is that we need to jazz up classroom & other training to look as appealing as all the other media they're bombarded with. I think this is the worst thing we could do. While I agree that as much as possible, school should be interesting and most importantly engaging...first of all the education system can't possibly compete with the billions of dollars the entertainment industry spends. And second of all, it would reinforce the idea of style over substance. One of the most critical things we need to teach children today is how to discern quality information from whatever source or media it might come. Corporate America and the advertising world might prefer to have a nation of drones easy to manipulate to buy things based on what's the shiniest or flashiest, we need todays children to be able to think critically and creatively to solve problems and a large part of that is the ability to strip away the garbage and presentation and get to the quality of the idea.
    Sorry for the rant.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


Destruction Is Tough >>
<< Watch The News Change
 tdicon 

A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss

Powered by Postrank

From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This