AOL Time Warner Merger Doesn't Add Up
from the numbers-don't-look-good dept
The Washington Post takes a look (in retrospect) of the AOL Time Warner merger and decides that it was a big mistake. The only people who might have made out well were AOL shareholders - whose shares are probably worth more, because of Time Warner, than they would have otherwise. I think that everyone knew at the time that Time Warner was really the more valuable piece of the puzzle - but I don't think the two companies have done a very good job leveraging each other.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- SEC Told Pandora To Be More Explicit In Its IPO That Its Business Is Likely Unsustainable Due To Crazy Licensing Rates
- The Fine Line Between Crowdfunding & An Illegal Securities Offering Part II: SEC Fines Ad Execs Over Pabst Stunt
- As Pandora Goes Public, How Come No One Is Pointing Out That It Misled The Press About Being Profitable?
- Don't Try To Make Sense Of LinkedIn Share Price
- DailyDirt: Start-up Pitches And Strikeouts...





Add Your Comment