RSS
Filters No Substitute For Good Parenting
from the well,-duh dept
A new study has come out of Australia (where filtering is required) that could be useful for the current US library filter legal case. It basically proves what we all knew already. Most of the filters don't block a lot of what they're supposed to and do block many useful, educational, and otherwise non-objectable sites instead. The report also makes the point that our government keeps forgeting: filters are no substitute for good parenting.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- How Being More Open, Human And Awesome Can Save Anyone Worried About Making Money In Entertainment
- Evidence Shows That Megaupload Shutdown Had No Real Impact On Infringement
- DailyDirt: Anthropomorphizing Animals
- DailyDirt: Birds Do The Darndest Things
- iPhone Data Debunks Recording Industry's Report On How French Three Strikes Law Increased Sales
Add Your Comment