Should We Change How Stock Options Are Counted?
from the questions,-questions dept
Here are a couple of articles debating whether new legislation should pass that would require stock options to be reported on financial statements. The government is hoping that doing so will help to avoid Enron like scandals, but the tech industry is yelling that it will destroy the usefulness of one of Silicon Valley's driving fuels. It does seem clear that it would hurt official earnings reports (suddenly another, somewhat large, expense will be added to many income statements). However, many firms do use it to offset taxes - so they are using it to their advantage as an expense, but not when it looks bad. It wouldn't actually change how well a business is doing - just how well it appears to be doing, making the numbers more realistic. I am generally for any accounting rule that makes financial statements more accurate in the long run. The "incentive" of stock options should be that it gives an ownership stake to employees - and not that it's a great tax dodge for the company.
1 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- SEC Told Pandora To Be More Explicit In Its IPO That Its Business Is Likely Unsustainable Due To Crazy Licensing Rates
- The Fine Line Between Crowdfunding & An Illegal Securities Offering Part II: SEC Fines Ad Execs Over Pabst Stunt
- As Pandora Goes Public, How Come No One Is Pointing Out That It Misled The Press About Being Profitable?
- Don't Try To Make Sense Of LinkedIn Share Price
- DailyDirt: Start-up Pitches And Strikeouts...





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
No Subject Given
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment