Law Firm Takes On Spammer

from the go-for-it dept

Recently a spammer attacked Techdirt by spamming an unknown number of people and the bastards had the gall to include a Techdirt URL in the subject line and a screenshot of Techdirt within the email (even though they were advertising something that had nothing to do with Techdirt). To say it made me angry would be something of an understatement. I sent it on to Techdirt's lawyers who basically said that any lawsuit would be very costly, and unlikely to be worth it. I'm still angry about the whole thing. But that experience makes me even happier when I see people going after spammers. The latest is that Morrison & Foerster, California's largest law firm (and owners of the wonderful mofo.com domain) are suing a company they claim spammed them over 6,000 times. The accused company, Etracks.com, says that someone at the law firm put their names on the list setting up a legitimate "business relationship".

3 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Mis-statement or serious legal loophole?

    identicon
    whit, Mar 15th, 2002 @ 3:20pm

    From the article, a quote from Etracks' lawyer: "I suspect what's happened here is that Morrison & Foerster employees have either at work or at home gotten on to some of these Web sites and registered there," Wilson said. "When and if they did that they created a business relationship with our clients and authorized the sending of e-mail to that domain."

    I've got to find out whether this is really Etracks' policy -- I can't belive that any relatively mainstream marketing company (even a gray-market email marketing company) would propose that that a "registration" by a single user would create a business relationship with every single user at that domain. Sure, they'll spam any address they can get, but most of these companies just apologize and claim some sort of not-to-be-repeated error when caught out this badly.

    ...that's just utterly insane...one AOL user neglects to un-check a "yes, please sell my email address to anyone who will buy it" box, therefore your company has established a business relationship with any sucker who gets an @aol.com email address?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    The wisdom of

    identicon
    Clarence Darrow, Mar 16th, 2002 @ 7:49am

    I have to question the wisdom of spamming a whole domain full of lawyers and then having the guts to say they had a right to do it. It is like when some skell trys to holdup the bar where the off duty cops hang out.

    However, I do have to thank Etracks for their bonehead move, it may result in stronger antispam laws.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Also interesting

    identicon
    David, Mar 16th, 2002 @ 9:34am

    Also interesting to note that Etracks has Conde Nast and Office Depot as clients. Just knowing that these two companies employ spamming as an advertising tactic makes me want to avoid any business with them, even if I've never actually gotten spam from either of them before.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This