Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   This could apply to other industries

   

   Oliver Wendell Jones, Mar 14th, 2002 @ 10:34am

   
   

   What happens if (heaven forbid) this should get pushed through and becomes law?
   
   How long until the insurance industry decides that they could save bazillions of dollars each year if all automobiles had new 'technology' added that prevents them from speeding, etc.
   
   Pretty much everyone agrees that speeding is illegal, and lots of people do it anyways (kind of like piracy).
   
   Do you think Americans are going to want to buy cars with new, improved 'technology' that prevents them from exceeding the posted speed limit?
   
   Who knows what other 'technology' could be implemented to help save other industries?

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   Re: This could apply to other industries

   

   miguelita, Mar 14th, 2002 @ 11:57am

   
   

   Speeding is not "kind of like" piracy. Piracy, by definition, involves stealing; speeding isn't robbing anyone of anything. I agree with your thought, though not with your metaphor.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   Re: This could apply to other industries

   

   Mike (profile), Mar 14th, 2002 @ 12:02pm

   
   

   Well, not to get into a semantics debate, but I still don't believe that file trading is either piracy or stealing. No one is missing anything if I share a file with someone else. It's not like taking a physical object. You have made an exact copy. In my understanding, you haven't stolen anything if the person you "took" something from isn't missing anything.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   What is missing

   

   Floyd, Mar 14th, 2002 @ 12:49pm

   
   

   >Well, not to get into a semantics debate, but I still don't believe that file trading is either piracy or stealing. No one is missing anything if I share a file with someone else. It's not like taking a physical object. You have made an exact copy. In my understanding, you haven't stolen anything if the person you "took" something from isn't missing anything.< br>
   The artist, producer, distributer and others who would normally share in the sale of an item are deprived of income.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   Re: What is missing

   

   Mike (profile), Mar 14th, 2002 @ 12:59pm

   
   

   The artist, producer, distributer and others who would normally share in the sale of an item are deprived of income.
   
   That makes one very big assumption: that I would have bought the CD in the first place. If I never had any intention of buying it, then they're not losing anything.
   
   Or... another way to look at it. If I open up a pizza place and charge $3/slice, and some guy opens up a pizza place next door to me and charges $2/slice - by your definition of stealing, that guy is stealing from me, because I'm deprived of income that otherwise would have gone to me. I don't get the income because the consumer has an alternative...
   
   That's not stealing. That's business.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   piracy vs. used cd's?

   

   miguelita, Mar 14th, 2002 @ 2:40pm

   
   

   i don't get it... how come software "piracy" is wrong, but used-cd stores, which also prevent artists/labels from getting $$, are OK?

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   Re: What is missing

   

   Anonymous Coward, Mar 14th, 2002 @ 2:47pm

   
   

   Why does this subject always touch off such a disagreement on basic principles? Piracy is not exactly the same as stealing, but is illegal nonetheless. I thought the speeding analogy was a good one. Better than the pizza one, although that would be a better analogy if, say, the cheaper pizza place were also called Pizza Hut (trademark infringement), stole your secret sauce recipe (trade secret), duplicated your patented pizza ovens (patent infringement), and stole your menu artwork (copyright infringement).

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   Re: This could apply to other industries

   

   Anonymous Coward, Mar 15th, 2002 @ 5:07am

   
   

   Pretty much everyone agrees that speeding is illegal, and lots of people do it anyways (kind of like piracy).

   There's nothing to "agree" on, it's either forbidden by law (definition of illegal) or it isn't.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   No Subject Given

   

   Mike Rerick, Mar 15th, 2002 @ 7:44am

   
   

   Unfortunately, the first thing that all politicians care about is getting re-elected. Big companies have lots of money that they can "donate" to a campaign fund. Ordinary citizens don't. Who are the politicians going to listen to?

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    yeah right...consumers.

    

    thecaptain, Mar 15th, 2002 @ 8:25am

    
    

    " But, no one invited the consumers. It's a valid point. If Congress is supposed to be looking out for the rights of the people, and not just companies, you would think they would do a better job talking to the people who pay the salaries of the entertainment industry."
    
    Actually, the entertainment industry has pretty much proven (and worked hard to convince Congress) that we aren't customers, that the majority of us are thieves and law-breakers who live to deprive them of their income, as such, I doubt they feel we should have ANY say.
    
    I always thought that in the US, it was innocent until proven guilty. I guess that went out the door with "fair use" right? SIGH

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment