Manage To Fail Through Weirdness

from the huh? dept

It seems that management theories have gotten so overused that now the latest management theory seems to be to ignore all management theories. Or, at least, that's what I think the point of this article is. It talks about some management theories designed to get attention and be innovative. Part of the point is that most management theories become so popular that everyone follows them, and then they are very predictable and not particularly innovative. So, to get around that you should act weird and not follow any trends. Of course, once this becomes an accepted management principal, then what are you supposed to do?

6 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    The object being...

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 3rd, 2002 @ 2:42am

    ...to act so weird that all the other managers around you need prozac to cope; once that goal is accomplished the rest is easy...

    But seriously folks... if you're constantly shopping around for new managment "theories", then you probably don't have any of your own and are faire game on the menu of the next corporate downsizing power lunch.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    This my theory and the theory is mine:

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 3rd, 2002 @ 3:07am

    Random Shootings.

    How more unpredictable and quirky can you get that that?

    Announce it a day before instituting the policy, that way all the slackers who actually read memos (and take them seriously) will go away of their own free accord.

    On the day that the policy goes into effect, shoot someone in the head who is clearly a slacker (can be anyone, upper managment, worker bee, mail room clerk... the more random the better), the second wave of people leaving will be all those who read the memo but didn't take it seriously. If nobody leaves, shoot another one.

    On the thrid day, you will be left only with "die-hard" employees who *really* need their jobs and will work tirelessly for you in even the most abhorable working condictions. Expect productivity improvements in the 1000% category.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    Floyd-O-Matic, Jan 3rd, 2002 @ 5:50am

    It seems to me as though the article applies to companies that are striving to innovate, and NOT to companies that are working toward a smooth process that generates cash flow, such as manufacturing, bookkeeping, retail, etc.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    Re: This my theory and the theory is mine:

    identicon
    Joe Schmoe, Jan 3rd, 2002 @ 9:51am

    Re: Shot in the dark schema above

    This has been done... USPS...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    Re: This my theory and the theory is mine:

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 3rd, 2002 @ 10:22am

    Uh... not it hasn't...

    "Going Postal" is strictly a bottom up schema.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  

    Re: This my theory and the theory is mine:

    identicon
    sb, Jan 3rd, 2002 @ 12:07pm

    once your hackneyed cliches are in dilbert, youre in trouble....theres no i in team,,,or making karate parallels to the project....yuk....overpaid babysitters ? how about those corny motivational posters? Only the lead sled dog has a good view, etc.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This