Fingered By The Movie Police
from the guilty-until-proven-innocent dept
Salon is running a good article that points out (yet another) problem with the DMCA. It's the story of someone who had their internet access cut off because the MPAA decided they had uploaded a movie. The problem is that the person in question hadn't uploaded a movie - and in fact hadn't been near the computer when the upload apparently took place. Yet, the ISP still cut them off without asking for their side of the story. That's what the law says they need to do. The MPAA says that if the person is innocent than they have nothing to fear (that sounds ominously familiar, doesn't it?). Why is it that almost anyone with common sense knows the DMCA is a horrible piece of legislation that takes away so many individual rights and unfairly burdens people while giving excessive and unnecessary rights to corporations - and yet lawmakers have no plans to do anything about it?
1 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- How TPP Would Put Massive Burdens On Those Accused Of Infringement
- Common Sense Wins: Finnish Court Says Open WiFi Owner Not Liable For Infringement By User
- Time To Realize That The Obama Administration Doesn't Even Have The Authority To Commit The US To ACTA Or TPP
- Feds Tie Themselves In Legal Knots Arguing For Domain Forfeiture In Rojadirecta Case
- Tenenbaum To Supreme Court: Let's Get This Constitutional Debate On Statutory Rates For Copyright Infringement Rolling






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
money money money
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment