SEC Mandated Quiet Period Doesn't Exist
from the good-excuses dept
Many companies chose not to talk to analysts or the press for a certain period of time prior to their earnings announcement citing the "SEC-mandated quiet period" which, apparently, doesn't actually exist. Of course, that doesn't mean they should start talking it up. The article suggests that some companies just use it to hide from disclosing news they're uncomfortable about. They also blame regulation FD for forcing companies to be more quiet. My impression is that it's just a leftover from the IPO process - where I believe the quiet period is actually required.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- New Yorker Reporter May Have Uncovered Secretive Bitcoin Creator
- Let's Face It: S&P's Analysis Is A Joke... But It Still Has A Right To An Opinion
- Dear Everyone: Stock Market Problems Are Not Directly Due To S&P Downgrade
- Insanity: Getting Worked Up Over One Company's Slight Change Of Opinion In The Creditworthiness Of The US
- The MPAA Doesn't Want Anyone Shorting Movies





Add Your Comment