Tracking Down An Internet Scammer >>
<< Intel: Clueless In Santa Clara
 tdicon 


Ramblings

by Mike Masnick

Fri, Jan 5th 2001 12:31pm





Get Rid Of Free Content

from the bye-bye dept

An article from the CEO of ClickZ suggesting that all online publishers need to stop offering free content and suck it up and start charging. He admits that this will piss off a lot of people, but he thinks (probably correctly) that many online publishers would rather have a smaller number of paying customers than a huge number of freeloaders. His idea, though, instead of directly charging everyone is to force users to receive email mailing lists if they want to see content. As he says "there would be no 'opt' about it". I understand the argument he's making, but essentially he's saying the only way he can make money is to piss off his users. That doesn't seem like the most solid business model.

3 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Cluefulness

    identicon
    Ed, Jan 5th, 2001 @ 1:50pm

    Compare/constrast the cluefulness of this typical dot-com CEO and the retail expert interviewed a few stories further down the page. The former doesn't really have a clue and is grasping for any new business model to make a buck with little more to back it up than wishful thinking, while the latter seems to have a pretty solid understanding of what works that he can use in the present and even extrapolate into a reasonable future. Given this, is the recent fate of many dot-coms that surprising?

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Is this even legal?

    identicon
    Ryan, Jan 5th, 2001 @ 5:11pm

    Assuming you could actually get all the online publishers together (or even make a list of all the online publishers) and form some sort of association that decided to implement this, wouldn't that count as anti-competitive? Because in order for this to work, you basically would need a monopoly, otherwise people would just go elsewhere.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Re: Is this even legal?

    identicon
    alternatives, Jan 7th, 2001 @ 4:23pm

    Naw......the 'going elsewhere' would just mean that sites like slashdot, techdirt, epionions etc la would get a few more users.

    We *ALREADY* pay for content.

    We pay with our access fees. We pay with our time.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


Tracking Down An Internet Scammer >>
<< Intel: Clueless In Santa Clara
 tdicon 

A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss

Powered by Postrank

From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This