Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   Interesting...

   

   Linux Geek, Oct 23rd, 2000 @ 4:15pm

   
   

   I've noticed a lot of activities going on in the periphery of linux computing into alternative computing devices but I have to agree that the future of Linux (even though we all hate to admit) it will never be mainstream.
   
   BR
   
   Damn...I'm going to have to start using Windows again!

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   Re: Interesting...

   

   Anonymous Coward, Oct 23rd, 2000 @ 5:39pm

   
   

   Woudln't it suck that Mac OS X out-shipped Linux, thus placing BSD in front of Linux

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   Does the OS matter anymore?

   

   mhh5, Oct 23rd, 2000 @ 6:17pm

   
   

   I wonder why no one has "reverse engineered" MSOffice for platforms other than Win & Mac. (Assuming that it's possible to do!) Then no one would really care what OS they were using. Most people don't anyway. I think the only reason why Linux won't approach the desktop market is b/c no one has MS-compatible software for it.... Maybe when MS gets broken up, MSLinux will take over.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   Re: Does the OS matter anymore?

   

   u2604ab, Oct 23rd, 2000 @ 7:04pm

   
   

   MSLinux???? If that happens, I'll take up arms against the oppressor. Mark my words- If MS gets into linux they will destroy everything good about it.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   Re: Interesting...

   

   Andy, Oct 23rd, 2000 @ 7:10pm

   
   

   I've noticed a lot of activities going on in the periphery of linux computing into alternative computing devices but I have to agree that the future of Linux (even though we all hate to admit) it will never be mainstream.
   
   
   Damn...I'm going to have to start using Windows again!

   Not necessarily... it seems likely that Linux will become accepted by corporate IT departments, thus it will become increasingly easy to use Linux if you want to. I haven't used Windows for three years... but I'm lucky to work at a company where all the technical people use Linux as their desktop. We're a small, recently aquired, branch (twig?) of a cable company... but even the centralized product development group uses Unix for their desktops (usually Solaris).

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   Re: Does the OS matter anymore?

   

   Mike (profile), Oct 23rd, 2000 @ 7:30pm

   
   

   mhh5 writes: I wonder why no one has "reverse engineered" MSOffice for platforms other than Win & Mac. (Assuming that it's possible to do!) Then no one would really care what OS they were using. Most people don't anyway. I think the only reason why Linux won't approach the desktop market is b/c no one has MS-compatible software for it.... Maybe when MS gets broken up, MSLinux will take over.

   Um, StarOffice anyone?

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   Re: Does the OS matter anymore?

   

   mhh5, Oct 23rd, 2000 @ 11:04pm

   
   

   I didn't think StarOffice was fully compatible *with the same look-and-feel* of MSOffice... Is it? That's what I meant by "reverse engineer" MSOffice. There are already plenty of "office suite applications" that are semi-compatible with MSOffice. But no one uses them b/c the GUIs are slightly different, and no one wants to "re-learn" another spreadsheet, word processor, etc...

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   BTW...

   

   mhh5, Oct 23rd, 2000 @ 11:19pm

   
   

   Somewhat non sequitar thought here: the "new" Mac MSOffice is a really bad idea for Apple, I think. It will only exclude MacOS from *Ever* being an office computer. It's all fine and dandy to say "hey, it's MS-compatible, but it's got the look and feel of a mac!", but it's exactly that difference that prevents Macs from really entering the workplace. Administrative assistants do not like "new, improved" interfaces....
   
   I'm pretty sure that's the whole reason behind making a separate Mac edition. MS wants Macs to be a neat little *home* computer for the kiddies since no one will want to do office work on them.... There's already a MS-compatible suite of applications that has a "Mac look&feel" -- it's called AppleWorks. And no one uses it.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   Re: BTW...

   

   L, Oct 24th, 2000 @ 4:28am

   
   

   Funny you should say that about Admin assistants - I was talking to one of ours today and she has had her Mac replaced by a Windows machine and was saying how ghastly and hard to use she thought the interface was......
   
   L.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    Re: BTW...

    

    Ryan, Oct 24th, 2000 @ 7:58am

    
    

    I was wondering if anyone uses a MAC for business purposes (or Linux for that matter)? I know all the techies here at work use linux and some designers use MACs but I haven't meet one business guy that uses Linux (as their main OS)?

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11.  

    Re: BTW...

    

    mhh5, Oct 24th, 2000 @ 11:34am

    
    

    well, check out http://www.thebusinessmac.com/.... As for linux, do you seriously think a non-techie would use linux right now? What would they use it for?

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

12.  

    Re: BTW...

    

    Mike (profile), Oct 24th, 2000 @ 11:49am

    
    

    I do know some people who use Linux for non-techie reasons, but they all work for linux-related companies, so I guess they don't count.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment