RSS
P&G Cybersquatting?
from the no,-it's-a- dept
It seems the Procter and Gamble has a bunch of domain names they've decided they don't need. So, up on the auction block they go. Some of the available domains include beautiful.com and flu.com. TheRegister points out that if someone else were selling these domains they'd be called a cybersquatter, but with P&G it's simply a "great opportunity".
1 Comments | Leave a Comment..
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Not necessarily
If their intent was to use them and then they didn't, it's not squatting. Though obviously knowing that is difficult from the outside, except that the listed names appear to be ones that P&G may have used.
MB
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment