RSS
Twitter
Gimme Some Of That Sweet DRM-Free Seoul Music
from the if-they-can-do-it-there dept
It's pretty clear, from anecdotal evidence alone, that DRM makes media less valuable, as it restricts what a user can do with it. It's possible that businesses realize this, but still deem it worthwhile to restrict content, out of fear that piracy costs will outweigh the benefits of providing DRM-free media. In Korea, the music industry is actually attempting to quantify the difference in value by making DRM-free tracks available at a 40% higher price point than the locked down alternative. This is a clever use of price discrimination; the people attracted to the DRM-free material will be those who really want to listen to music on multiple devices, while still selling music at a lower price to less demanding consumers. This may not even contribute to piracy, since there may not be a lot of people willing to pay more, just so they can give it away. Of course, it remains to be seen whether the price ($.50 vs. $.70) is cheap enough to dissuade users from file trading, but the industry should be commended for experimenting. In the past, the Korean music industry has tried anti-consumer tactics worthy of the RIAA, so they seem to be getting the message. If nothing else, the music industry here would be wise to watch how the Korean market unfolds, to consider adopting a similar approach.
Reader Comments
(Flattened / Threaded)
Is it Just me...
...or is it getting a little cyberpunky in here? DRM sounds a heck of a lot like infected wetware.
Case eyed the DRM infested Prussian Blue with distaste. "I'm not slotting that in." He licked his lips. "You got anything cleaner?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Is it Just me...
In my mind's eye, I have come to equate DRM as meaning the same as WMD - except the DRM actually exists....
And it's getting worse...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Admission
Isn't this an blatant admission that DRM'd music is less valuable than DRM-free music? Although I doubt the industry would ever say those words, it's funny to see it in action.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I like the idea...
I'd be willing to pay a bit more for music that is DRM free and undeniably legal. As long as the price difference isn't that much, I can see it working.
I dont think it's all that much an indictment against DRM as it is an attempt to dissuade piracy. People steal music for a variety of reasons, if prices were cheap enough to get DRM free stuff, I think people would go for it.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, although I think the tactics of RIAA are horrible, I cant see music existing without some form of major corporate backing. Sure some artists can survive without the deep pockets of the music industry, but most need the advertising money to get enough publicity to be financially salient.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Why dont they just come right out and say: we accept that DRM doesnt work so now we're going to charge you extra for something that you already had......
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
I agree with Mr Rat - this is just an under handed way of pushing up the price.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
Gotta say i agree. Is the DRM wave just a way to raise the prices of CDs even more? hmmm price fixing to the max man.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Would you be so critical, those of you who feel this is just a way to charge more, if a 3rd party somehow managed to get permission to sell straight high-bitrate MP3s, sold only those, and charged a higher price?
My guess is no. Certainly, they should be watched with a critical eye, but there's still a chance they might not hang themselves with this rope.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
problem
If theyre only raising the prices that wouldnt help any. They should *lower* the prices of DRM music, that would attract less piracy.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: problem
If this was happening in the US, as soon as consumers started purchasing the DRM-free versions, the RIAA would decide that it means that people are willing to pay more for for each track, so they'd raise the price of the DRM versions.
Then, once people begin to buy less of the now more expensive DRM tracks, they'd blame it on piracy.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Power vs Force
RIAA and MPAA CEOs would do welll to read Power vs Force by David Hawkins.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Pfft
Why would I pay more for something I can get for free?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Pfft
Because it's the right thing to do?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment